<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
  <channel>
    <title>Textqualität on VikoMarketing - Marketing Strategies in Focus</title>
    <link>https://vikomarketing.com/en/tags/textqualit%C3%A4t/</link>
    <description>Recent content in Textqualität on VikoMarketing - Marketing Strategies in Focus</description>
    <generator>Hugo -- 0.146.0</generator>
    <language>en</language>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 04 Apr 2026 08:06:27 +0100</lastBuildDate>
    <atom:link href="https://vikomarketing.com/en/tags/textqualit%C3%A4t/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
    <item>
      <title>Content Depth vs. Content Length: Why More Words Isn&#39;t Winning Anymore</title>
      <link>https://vikomarketing.com/en/posts/content-tiefe-statt-laenge-so-rankt-ihr-wirklich/</link>
      <pubDate>Sat, 04 Apr 2026 08:06:27 +0100</pubDate>
      <guid>https://vikomarketing.com/en/posts/content-tiefe-statt-laenge-so-rankt-ihr-wirklich/</guid>
      <description>&lt;h1 id=&#34;content-depth-vs-content-length-why-more-words-isnt-winning-anymore&#34;&gt;Content Depth vs. Content Length: Why More Words Isn&amp;rsquo;t Winning Anymore&lt;/h1&gt;
&lt;h2 id=&#34;tldr&#34;&gt;TL;DR&lt;/h2&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The SEO community has been quietly shifting away from the &amp;ldquo;just write more&amp;rdquo; mentality, and a heated discussion on Reddit&amp;rsquo;s r/digital_marketing is putting that conversation front and center. The core argument is simple: Google doesn&amp;rsquo;t reward length — it rewards depth. A 600-word article that fully answers a question beats a 3,000-word piece padded with fluff. If your content strategy is still built around word counts, it&amp;rsquo;s time to rethink.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
