<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
  <channel>
    <title>Seo-Risiken on VikoMarketing - Marketing Strategies in Focus</title>
    <link>https://vikomarketing.com/en/tags/seo-risiken/</link>
    <description>Recent content in Seo-Risiken on VikoMarketing - Marketing Strategies in Focus</description>
    <generator>Hugo -- 0.146.0</generator>
    <language>en</language>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 10 Oct 2026 16:31:48 +0100</lastBuildDate>
    <atom:link href="https://vikomarketing.com/en/tags/seo-risiken/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
    <item>
      <title>AI SEO Advice Crashed a Sports Site From 5,000 Impressions a Day to 10: What We Know</title>
      <link>https://vikomarketing.com/en/posts/ai-seo-advice-crashed-one-of-my-sports-sites-from-5-000-impr/</link>
      <pubDate>Sat, 10 Oct 2026 16:31:48 +0100</pubDate>
      <guid>https://vikomarketing.com/en/posts/ai-seo-advice-crashed-one-of-my-sports-sites-from-5-000-impr/</guid>
      <description>&lt;h1 id=&#34;ai-seo-advice-crashed-a-sports-site-from-5000-impressions-a-day-to-10-what-we-know&#34;&gt;AI SEO Advice Crashed a Sports Site From 5,000 Impressions a Day to 10: What We Know&lt;/h1&gt;
&lt;h2 id=&#34;tldr&#34;&gt;TL;DR&lt;/h2&gt;
&lt;p&gt;A Reddit post in r/SEO claims that following AI-generated SEO advice cut one sports site&amp;rsquo;s search visibility from about 5,000 impressions a day to roughly 10. The thread has a score of 20 and 35 comments, so people are talking about it. The source package we have contains only the title and metadata, not the post body or the comments. We can&amp;rsquo;t confirm what the advice was, what changed on the site, or what the commenters concluded. Treat this as a warning flag, not a verified case study.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
