<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
  <channel>
    <title>Llm-Seo on VikoMarketing - Marketing Strategies in Focus</title>
    <link>https://vikomarketing.com/en/tags/llm-seo/</link>
    <description>Recent content in Llm-Seo on VikoMarketing - Marketing Strategies in Focus</description>
    <generator>Hugo -- 0.146.0</generator>
    <language>en</language>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 Apr 2026 08:38:35 +0100</lastBuildDate>
    <atom:link href="https://vikomarketing.com/en/tags/llm-seo/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
    <item>
      <title>Is Mass AI Content Still Worth It? The SEO Community Asks the Hard Questions</title>
      <link>https://vikomarketing.com/en/posts/ki-massenartikel-nachhaltig-seo/</link>
      <pubDate>Tue, 07 Apr 2026 08:38:35 +0100</pubDate>
      <guid>https://vikomarketing.com/en/posts/ki-massenartikel-nachhaltig-seo/</guid>
      <description>&lt;h1 id=&#34;is-mass-ai-content-still-worth-it-the-seo-community-asks-the-hard-questions&#34;&gt;Is Mass AI Content Still Worth It? The SEO Community Asks the Hard Questions&lt;/h1&gt;
&lt;h2 id=&#34;tldr&#34;&gt;TL;DR&lt;/h2&gt;
&lt;p&gt;A discussion in r/SEO is putting a long-debated question back on the table: can publishing 10 or more AI-generated posts per day — combined with a strategy of chasing LLM citations from tools like ChatGPT, Perplexity, and Gemini — actually hold up long-term? The community engagement around this thread (36 comments) signals real anxiety in the SEO world. The short answer from the conversation is: it&amp;rsquo;s complicated, and the risks are piling up. If you&amp;rsquo;re running a content operation at scale, this is a discussion you can&amp;rsquo;t afford to miss.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
