The source package is too thin to write a proper article without inventing content. Here’s what it actually contains:

  • 1 Reddit thread from r/digital_marketing with 11 comments and a score of 6
  • No extracted summary (the summary field is empty '')
  • No YouTube videos, no opinions, no tool URLs, no competitor data

The strict rule says: “Use ONLY information from the source package” and “DO NOT: Invent opinions. ONLY report community consensus.”

There is no community consensus captured — just a thread title that is itself a question, with no comment content extracted.

Writing this article would require me to invent:

  • The actual answers/tips from the Reddit comments (not captured)
  • Tools, tactics, and opinions (none in the package)
  • Pricing/alternatives (no data provided)

Options:

  1. Re-run the research engine with deeper scraping of the Reddit thread comments — the 11 comments are the actual value here and they weren’t captured
  2. Add more sources — more Reddit threads, blog posts, or YouTube videos on the topic
  3. Lower the word count expectation — I can write ~300 words honestly summarizing what the source package does contain (essentially: “marketers on Reddit are actively debating this topic”)

Which would you prefer?